Skip to content

The ultimate open-source yet enterprise-grade end-to-end testing solution.

Designed for distributed and asynchronous systems.
Revolutionizing high load testing for smarter, scalable solution.

Made for distributed & asynchronous systems.

QALIPSIS empowers software developers, QA teams, DevOps Engineers and IT operations to test faster, smarter and with pinpoint accuracy.

chip
Powerful real-world condition simulation
share
Support of a wide range of technologies
pc
Seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines

Say farewell to black-box testing

Schedule a guided demo
  • QALIPSIS is a new solution and a transparent alternative to black-box testing.
  • It gives developers, QA and DevOps engineers full control and deep visibility into distributed and asynchronous systems – so performance issues, bottlenecks, and failures are observable, reproducible, and explainable.
  • No hidden logic. No guessing. Just deterministic tests, real execution flows, and insights you can trust.

QALIPSIS: the testing tool you’ve been waiting for.

real time monitoring

Real-world load from 1k to millions & geographically distributed

CI/CD integration

Open-source, developer-first, CI/CD-native

Advanced protocol support

Works with REST, messaging, (No)SQL & more

Geographically distributed testing

Expose hidden behavior in distributed & async systems

Designed for end-to-end testing and high load generation.

See how QALIPSIS exposes what black-box tools miss.

Schedule a guided demo

Tackle your toughest challenges

QALIPSIS makes testing not just manageable but a breeze.

Development hours
Successful campaigns executed
Countries worldwide

Is your tool measuring latency – or proving the system worked?

performance testing

How does QALIPSIS upgrade your testing workflow?

 
If the system continues after the call returns, your test must continue too.
 

  • End-to-end flow modeling across protocols
  • Validation of downstream effects via database and broker steps
  • Deterministic execution model for consistent comparisons
  • Extend the test surface via plugins and custom steps
behavorial load

How does QALIPSIS strengthen test confidence?

 
A fast response doesn’t guarantee the workflow completed. QALIPSIS makes completion verifiable.

 

  • Distributed orchestration with built-in aggregation
  • Data collection during execution for objective validation
  • Export analytics to your monitoring/BI stack
  • Repeatable runs suitable for pipeline gating

Can your performance test prove what happened after the API call?

QALIPSIS doesn’t stop at β€œ200 OK.” It verifies messages sent, records written, and async side effects completed – as part of the same load scenario.
That’s the difference between traffic generation and end-to-end system validation.

If you’re comparing QALIPSIS with Grafana k6, Gatling, or Apache JMeter, use the table below to see which solutions can trace workflows across components and validate real outcomes – not just the direct request/response path.

QALIPSIS Grafana k6 Gatling JMeter
Technology stack support
Purpose-built for distributed & asynchronous systems
Designed from the ground up to test systems where multiple services communicate via APIs, message brokers, and databases β€” not just HTTP endpoints.
Yes
Explicitly designed for distributed architectures and asynchronous flows;
scenarios cover REST + messaging + databases as one end-to-end system.
No
Primarily web/API load testing
No
General load testing focus;
not built around distributed async system validation as a core thesis.
No
General-purpose load testing framework;
not built around distributed async system validation as a core thesis.
Native support for message brokers (beyond HTTP)
Ability to produce and consume messages on brokers like Kafka, RabbitMQ, or JMS as built-in test steps β€” not just HTTP calls.
Yes
Message brokers are first-class test targets via plugins (e.g., Kafka/RabbitMQ/JMS/Jakarta EE) and can be part of scenario flows.
No
Yes
Supports messaging protocols via built-in modules (notably JMS; other protocols depend on available modules).
Yes
Supports JMS as test plan steps (samplers).
Native support for databases
Ability to poll, save, or search databases (SQL, NoSQL, time-series) as first-class steps within a load-test scenario.
Yes
Databases are first-class test targets via plugins: Cassandra, MongoDB, PostgreSQL/MySQL/MariaDB via R2DBC-jasync, Redis (Lettuce), Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB, InfluxDB.
Database steps integrate into scenario flows alongside HTTP and messaging steps.
Partially
Not a built-in capability.
Partially
Gatling’s own gatling-jdbc artifact provides connection-pool configuration, not a load-test protocol.
Yes
Built-in JDBC Request sampler supports any JDBC-compatible database (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, etc.) as a native test-plan element.
Extensible
Provides a documented plugin or extension API that lets teams add support for custom protocols, proprietary systems, or third-party libraries.
Yes
You can create your own plugins and bring your own or proprietary libraries.
The architecture supports custom steps, events loggers, and meter registries.
Yes
The xk6 framework lets developers create custom extensions in Go (JavaScript extensions, Output extensions, Secret Source extensions, Subcommand extensions).
Extensions are compiled into a custom k6 binary.
Partially
Custom protocols can be implemented in Scala/Java by extending Gatling’s internal classes; third-party community plugins exist.
However, there is no formally documented, stable public extension API/SDK for creating plugins.
Yes
Java-based plugin architecture with well-documented extension points (Sampler, Listener, Function, Timer interfaces).
JMeter Plugins Manager simplifies discovery and installation of community plugins.
Complex workflows
End-to-end workflow tracing across requests + messages + records
Correlates a single business transaction across HTTP calls, broker messages, and database records β€” tracking it from start to finish with shared identifiers.
Yes
Traces use correlation IDs, origin markers, and timestamps;
they appear in logs and in analytics events/data.
No
No native cross-component workflow tracing model.
No
No native cross-component workflow tracing model.
No
No native cross-component workflow tracing model.
Off-path Outcome Verification
Validates outcomes that occur outside the direct request/response path β€” e.g., checking that a message landed in a queue or a record was written to a database after an API call.
Yes
Collects system/application data as analytics events and validates it inside the load workflow with standard assertions.
No
Can only validate what it directly executes/observes;
does not natively collect arbitrary system data for validation.
No
Can only validate outcomes within what it directly drives via supported protocols;
captures detailed protocol-level metrics and can assert on in-scope protocol interactions.
Partially
Can only validate outcomes of what it directly drives (e.g., protocol samplers);
captures sampler results and can query some systems (e.g., via JDBC/JMS) for checks.
Scalability and deployment
Distributed execution architecture
Runs load generation across multiple coordinated nodes with built-in orchestration, failure handling, and result aggregation.
Yes
Minions distributed by zones, then evenly across factories in-zone.
Workflow failures are treated as normal outcome states and reported as dedicated analytics events.
Aggregation available by campaign/scenario/zones.
Partially
Supports scaling execution (depending on deployment), but no native orchestration model with zone-based minion distribution and analytics-event outcome modeling.
Partially
Supports distributed runs (deployment/edition dependent), but no native orchestration model with zone-based minion distribution and analytics-event outcome modeling.
Partially
Distributed mode exists, but scaling is constrained by tight controller/remote-engine coupling
(controller coordination can become a bottleneck and adds operational friction at high scale).
Geo / zone-based load segmentation
Assigns load generators to named zones (geographic regions or network segments) and segments both execution and reporting by zone.
Yes
Zones can represent physical regions (countries/continents) or logical zones (IT networks);
zones drive both minion distribution and aggregation slices.
No
No
No
CI/CD-native interfaces
Offers CLI, API, or build-tool integrations that let load tests run unattended in CI/CD pipelines with repeatable, automatable execution.
Yes
CLI + REST API + Gradle-based build tool integration;
intended for pipeline execution and repeatability.
Yes
CLI-first execution model suitable for CI pipelines.
Yes
Code-first simulations suitable for CI pipelines.
Yes
CLI (non-GUI) execution is standard for automation.
Reporting and analytics
Live monitoring
Provides real-time visibility into test metrics β€” throughput, latency, success/failure rates β€” while a campaign is still running.
Yes
In standalone mode, a live console report shows real-time campaign metrics, per-scenario success/failure counts, and published step metrics.
The GUI displays in-process campaign results in real time on an interactive time-series chart.
Meters and events can also be streamed to external systems (Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, Graphite, TimescaleDB, Kafka) for live dashboarding and alerting.
Yes
Built-in web dashboard provides real-time metrics visualization in-browser during test execution.
Metrics can also be streamed to Grafana via InfluxDB, Prometheus remote-write, or other outputs for live dashboarding.
Partially
OSS provides live console output only;
real-time interactive dashboards require Gatling Enterprise (commercial) or streaming metrics via the built-in Graphite writer to InfluxDB + Grafana.
Partially
GUI listeners (e.g., View Results Tree, Summary Report) show results during execution but are not recommended under load.
Customizable reports
Lets users tailor post-test reports β€” filtering by scenario, adding metadata, or choosing output formats β€” rather than relying on a fixed report template.
Yes
The GUI supports creating/downloading campaign reports with scenario-level filtering.
Exported analytics data can be tagged with custom metadata (environment, team, project) and shaped into custom dashboards via third-party tools.
Yes
Allows fully custom end-of-test reports in any text format (HTML, JSON, XML, etc.).
Partially
OSS generates static non-customizable HTML reports.
Yes
The built-in HTML Dashboard Report generator is customizable via configuration and templating.
Analytics Export & Dashboarding
Streams or exports test analytics to external data stores and BI tools for custom dashboards, historical trending, and cross-team reporting.
Yes
Exports analytics data to third-party systems (e.g., Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, Graphite, TimescaleDB, Kafka) and supports dashboarding via independent tools (e.g., PowerBI, Tableau).
Partially
Exports metrics to supported outputs/backends;
dashboarding typically relies on external tools but is centered on metric streams rather than a richer analytics-event model.
Partially
Reporting/export exists;
integration is typically report/metrics-oriented rather than a unified analytics-event export stream.
Partially
Can export results via listeners/backends;
dashboarding relies on external tools and the chosen result backend.

Scale your testing, not your infrastructure.

View cloud pricing

The next-generation testing solution for high load, asynchronous and distributed systems

face smile

Unmatched visibility & real-time monitoring

Gain deep insights into system performance with live monitoring of logs, CPU, memory, and disk usage. Detect bottlenecks early and troubleshoot faster by understanding the root causes of issues.

curve

Testing for modern architectures

Unlike traditional load testing solutions that only stress-test isolated components, QALIPSIS validates entire distributed systems – including databases, messaging platforms, and microservices. It also supports asynchronous and event-driven architectures, ensuring comprehensive test coverage and using internal system data for assertions.

Seamless integration into your CI/CD pipeline

QALIPSIS is the first performance and load testing solution built for DevOps. With its CLI, REST API and Gradle plugin, it integrates effortlessly into CI/CD workflows, enabling automated performance validation and continuous optimization

network

Accurate, real-world load simulations

Simulate millions of concurrent users across multiple geographical locations, replicating real-world behavioral patterns to test your system under true-to-life conditions.

curve

Scenario-driven, customizable testing

Instead of just sending bulk requests, QALIPSIS allows you to define complex user journeys, validate system interactions, and analyze performance trends over time – ensuring a realistic and actionable testing approach.

green globe

Geographically distributed testing

Unlike many traditional solutions, QALIPSIS enables load generation from multiple locations worldwide, helping you assess performance based on regional demand and infrastructure.

Support for diverse technologies and protocols

Go beyond HTTP and REST – QALIPSIS supports messaging queues, databases, WebSockets, and any Java-compatible system. It can even be extended to proprietary technologies, offering unmatched flexibility.

shield

Flexible, scalable, and cost-effective deployment

Deploy on-premise, in the cloud, or within containers, adapting to your infrastructure and budget requirements. Scale effortlessly by adding more QALIPSIS nodes as needed.

Get a technical walkthrough built around your architecture.

Schedule a guided demo
Proven results with QALIPSIS

Success stories

Discover how businesses leveled up their testing, cut costs and delivered rock-solid, scalable applications with QALIPSIS.

How it works

  1. 1
    clover

    Test scenario definition

    Users define test scenarios using QALIPSIS’s domain-specific language (DSL) based on Kotlin, specifying the sequence of actions, data inputs, and expected outcomes.

  2. 2
    clover

    Real-time threshold validation

    Set performance thresholds and automatically detect slowdowns, failures, or unexpected behaviors during test execution.

  3. 3
    clover

    Execution

    The defined scenarios are executed by QALIPSIS, which simulates the specified user behaviors and interactions with the system under test.

  4. 4
    clover

    Monitoring

    Throughout the execution, QALIPSIS collects and displays real-time metrics, allowing users to monitor system performance.

  5. 5
    clover

    Analysis

    After execution, detailed reports and dashboards are created, enabling users to analyze results, identify issues, and make informed decisions for system optimization.

Book a demo built around your systems and success criteria.

Schedule a guided demo